Note: This article was adapted from the booklet Ocean Acidification - Starting with the Science, from the National Research Council's Ocean Studies Board. The booklet is based on the report Ocean Acidification: A National Strategy to Meet the Challenges of a Changing Ocean, which reviews the current state of knowledge and identifies gaps in understanding, and provides scientific advice to help guide the national ocean acidification research program.
Covering more than 70 percent of the Earth’s surface, the ocean is one of the Earth’s most distinguishing characteristics.
Over recent years, human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels (coal, oil, natural gas) have increased the amount of carbon dioxide gas emitted to the atmosphere—and the amount that dissolves into the ocean. Now, so much carbon dioxide has been absorbed by the ocean that the chemistry of seawater is changing, causing the ocean to become more acidic.
Carbon dioxide is a critical part of Earth’s atmosphere; it traps heat and prevents the Earth from being so cold that life could not exist. Normally, the Earth’s carbon cycle maintains a natural balance of carbon in the atmosphere, land, and ocean. However, since the beginning of the industrial era, emissions of carbon dioxide have climbed, and now are exceeding the capacity of the carbon cycle to maintain an equilibrium between the atmosphere and ocean. Excess carbon dioxide traps more heat in the atmosphere, which changes the Earth’s climate.
Not all of the excess carbon dioxide stays in the atmosphere. Scientists estimate that one-third of all the carbon dioxide produced by human activities has been absorbed by the ocean. The ocean’s removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere has undoubtedly helped curb the extent of climate change—but this benefit has come at a cost. The absorption of carbon dioxide is changing the chemistry of the ocean by triggering reactions that make seawater more acidic, a phenomenon called ocean acidification (OA). In fact, the ocean has become nearly 30 percent more acidic than it was at the beginning of the industrial era—a change larger and more rapid than seen in the fossil record going back at least 800,000 years.
For the first half of the twentieth century, scientists thought the “excess” carbon dioxide generated by burning fossil fuels would be taken up by vegetation and absorbed by the ocean without accumulating in the atmosphere. But a key paper published in 1957 by Roger Revelle, director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, together with chemist Hans Suess, hypothesized that the ocean would absorb carbon dioxide at a much slower rate than was previously thought.
The paper is widely regarded as the initial study of global warming because it recognized that if the ocean couldn’t take up all of the carbon dioxide from fossil fuels, the excess must be accumulating in the atmosphere. To help test this hypothesis, Revelle hired Charles David Keeling, a young researcher who had developed the first instrument for accurately measuring atmospheric carbon dioxide levels while he was a postdoctoral fellow at the California Institute of Technology. Keeling set up his equipment at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii, far from the localized effects of fossil fuels, to take precise, daily measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. The now famous Keeling Curve documents a steady increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide that continues today, providing evidence that natural carbon cycling isn’t keeping pace with human carbon dioxide emissions.
With evidence of carbon dioxide emissions accumulating in the atmosphere, oceanographers decided they should also track carbon concentrations in the ocean to see if carbon dioxide was also accumulating there. Studies that began in the mid 1980s have shown that concentrations of carbon dioxide in the ocean are increasing in parallel with the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Atmospheric carbon dioxide is absorbed by the ocean, where it reacts with seawater to form carbonic acid (H2CO3). Almost immediately, carbonic acid dissociates to form bicarbonate ions (HCO3-) and hydrogen ions (H+). As the concentration of hydrogen ions increases, the water becomes more acidic.
Some of the extra hydrogen ions react with carbonate ions (CO3 2-) to form more bicarbonate. This makes carbonate ions less abundant—a problem for many marine species that absorb carbonate from seawater and use it to build calcium carbonate shells and skeletons in a process called calcification. As carbonate becomes less abundant, these organisms, such as corals and clams, have more difficulty building and maintaining their shells and skeletons.
Increased acidity can even cause some carbonate shells and skeletons to dissolve. Hydrogen ions react with the solid calcium carbonate (CaCO3) and convert it to soluble bicarbonate (HCO3-) and (Ca2+) ions.
Scientists use pH—a measure of the concentration of hydrogen ions using a logarithmic scale—as an indicator of the acidity of a solution. As the hydrogen ion concentration increases, a solution becomes more acidic and its pH decreases. Because the scale is logarithmic, a decrease of one pH unit corresponds to a 10-fold increase in acidity.
Calcifiers—organisms with shells or skeletons made from calcium carbonate—are among the most abundant forms of marine life. Ranging from tiny plankton species such as pteropods and foraminifera that form the basis of marine food chains, to the vast coral reefs that provide habitat for many ocean animals, calcifiers are an essential part of many marine ecosystems.
As ocean acidification decreases the availability of carbonate ions, these organisms must work harder to produce shells. As a result, they have less energy left to find food, to reproduce, or to defend against disease or predators. As the ocean becomes more acidic, populations of some species could decline, and others may even go extinct.
Pteropods are an important source of food for many species, including fish, seals, and whales. But pteropods have delicate calcium carbonate shells that are vulnerable to ocean acidification. In a series of experiments, Victoria Fabry of California State University at San Marcos placed pteropods in seawater at the pH (acidity) projected for the Southern Ocean by 2100. Within 48 hours, the pteropod shells began to dissolve.
Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is a massive coral ecosystem that is the largest biological structure in the world, visible even from space. The reef provides habitat for more than 1,500 species of fish and 400 species of coral—but recently, scientific studies have shown that the growth of the Great Barrier Reef’s coral colonies has decreased by 14 percent since 1990. If growth rates continue to decline to the point that damage and erosion outpace repair, the reef system may begin to shrink. Some marine biologists think ocean acidification could be contributing to the decline in coral growth. Every coral reef begins with tiny coral polyps that use the carbonate ions naturally found in seawater to form a hard calcium carbonate skeleton. Over time, the skeletons of many coral polyps will build up the structure of the reef. But ocean acidification is reducing the availability of carbonate ions, making it harder for corals to grow or repair damage.
Other stressors, such as rising ocean temperature and pollution, could also contribute to declines in coral reef ecosystems. Although scientists are just beginning to piece together the relative impact of each factor, it is clear that such a combination of stressors will ultimately threaten the health of the reef system.
An increase in the acidity of the seawater, combined with other environmental stressors like increasing ocean temperature and pollution, has the potential to affect many biological processes.
Many animals and some algae use carbonate ions to make calcium carbonate shells and skeletons. Because ocean acidification decreases the availability of carbonate ions, these organisms will have to work harder to produce shells.
Many metabolic processes of organisms are fine-tuned to operate within a narrow pH range; outside of that range, the reactions may be too slow or inefficient to keep the organism healthy. Although many species can adjust to changes in their surroundings by actively maintaining a constant internal environment, this maintenance requires a significant expenditure of energy. An adult fish may be able to compensate by eating more, but fish eggs and larvae have limited energy reserves and, therefore, may have less capacity to adjust to more acidic conditions.
Carbon dioxide can stimulate plant growth by boosting the rate of photosynthesis. Many plants, including seagrasses, grow more rapidly under elevated carbon dioxide conditions. Although seagrasses provide valuable habitat, this could be too much of a good thing, if these plants overgrow less robust species and reduce the ecosystem’s biodiversity.
Ocean acidification could make it harder for marine organisms to absorb nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and other elements essential for growth. For example, when seawater becomes more acidic, iron attaches to organic compounds, preventing marine life from using this essential element.
As important as it is to understand how ocean acidification will affect individual organisms, it’s even more important to understand how these changes will scale up to populations and marine ecosystems. Marine ecosystems support wild fish stocks, shellfish farms, and provide other services to people through recreation, commerce, and even protection from storm surges. Because ecosystems represent an intricate network among organisms and their interactions with the environment, a disturbance to one part can have cascading effects throughout the system.
Many species known to be vulnerable to ocean acidification play critical roles in ecosystems, such as the corals and seagrasses that form habitat for diverse communities of organisms. When ocean acidification triggers even a relatively subtle change in an organism’s performance, it can scale up to a change in the size of the population (e.g. through changes in survival, growth, or reproductive success), altering the composition of an ecological community, and potentially the entire marine ecosystem.
One of the challenges scientists face is the difficulty of scaling up laboratory experiments on single species for a short period of time to the complex interactions of species in an ecosystem over many generations. Some insights can be gleaned from waters naturally high in carbon dioxide and past events in the Earth’s geological record.
Beneath the Mediterranean Sea, carbon dioxide bubbles from volcanic vents in the seafloor, making the water around the vents more acidic—offering scientists an opportunity to conduct a natural experiment to investigate the effects of acidified seawater. That’s exactly what oceanographer Jason Hall-Spencer of the University of Plymouth in the U.K. and his colleagues did when they compared the marine communities in areas close to the vents with adjacent areas that lacked vents. Although the vents do not fully replicate the conditions of global ocean acidification, they do provide some clues as to how marine ecosystems might respond to the expected changes in ocean chemistry. The researchers found that overall biodiversity was lower at the carbon dioxide vent sites, with a notable decrease in the abundance of calcifying organisms such as sea urchins, corals, and calcified algae. The study also showed that there are ecological winners and losers, with some organisms more able to tolerate acidic conditions than others. For example, seagrasses and brown algae were abundant at the vents, seeming to thrive in the high carbon dioxide water.
About 65 million years ago, an asteroid slammed into the Yucatan Peninsula, just north of what is now the city of Merida, Mexico. The asteroid, perhaps six miles in diameter, ejected enough soot and dust into the atmosphere to block out the sun for months or longer, contributing to the widespread death of plants and animals. This event, called the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary extinction, is famous for the demise of the dinosaurs and roughly sixty percent of all species on Earth disappeared as a result of this cataclysm.
Oceanic species were particularly vulnerable to the effects of the asteroid impact. Many marine organisms went extinct, including marine species that built shells or skeletons out of calcium carbonate. A look at the fossil record shows that corals became rare, shell-forming plankton went extinct, and many species of mussels disappeared.
Why did these marine organisms die out? It turns out that the Yucatan Peninsula is largely a giant block of calcium carbonate and calcium sulfate, formed by the remnants of ancient marine organisms. When the asteroid struck, the heat and pressure of the impact caused the release of sulfur dioxide, nitrates, and other compounds into the atmosphere. There, the compounds reacted with oxygen and water to form acid (e.g., sulfuric acid and nitric acid), which rained down into the ocean. The surface waters of the ocean became so acidic that marine organisms could not maintain their calcium carbonate shells and skeletons. Only organisms able to withstand the acidic conditions persisted, typically species without calcareous shells such as diatoms, a type of planktonic plant with a shell made of silica, rather than calcium carbonate.
The temporary environment created by the asteroid provides a clue to what might happen with present day ocean acidification, but it is not directly analogous. One of the differences is that dust from the impact darkened the sky, thus inhibiting plant growth and cooling the atmosphere. Also, the increase in ocean acidity from the asteroid was relatively short lived, lasting just hundreds of years, because mixing of the acidified surface with deeper waters restored the chemical balance of the upper ocean. Even so, fossil evidence indicates that many species never recovered and coral reefs did not reappear for another two million years. Today’s acidification, caused by the steep climb in carbon dioxide emissions over the last 200 years, will likely affect marine ecosystems from the surface to the deep and will persist for many centuries to come.
The specific effects of ocean acidification will vary from place to place, depending on the habitat and the types of organisms in the ecosystem. Below are descriptions of how ocean acidification is likely to affect a variety of ocean ecosystems.
Open ocean ecosystems are based on plankton, a mixture of tiny free-floating plants and animals that live and grow in sunlit surface waters and serve as the foundation of the marine food chain. A number of planktonic species, including coccolithophores, foraminifera, and pteropods, need carbonate ions to build their shells. If ocean acidification increases, these carbonate-based plankton species may decline – and that means that a range of species, including fish, seals, and whales, could lose their preferred foods, or have less food altogether.
In the natural world, corals must grow rapidly to outpace predation by fish and other organisms, and to compete for space with algae and sea grasses. But experiments show that ocean acidification prevents reef-building corals from growing fast enough to escape predation and competition, or to repair physical damage sufficiently. Slowed growth is not the only impact that ocean acidification could have on coral reefs – some scientists think that more acidic conditions could also contribute to coral bleaching.
The polar waters of the Arctic and Southern oceans harbor many protected and endangered marine mammals and support some of the most productive fisheries in the world. Carbon dioxide dissolves more readily in cold water, acidifying the waters of polar regions faster than in lower latitudes. In fact, scientists have determined that the surface waters of the Southern Ocean will begin to become corrosive to some types of carbonate structures by the year 2050 if carbon dioxide emissions continue to increase at the current rate.
Corals are not only found in warm, shallow, tropical waters—these animals are also found in the deep sea, some 40 meters (about 131 feet) to 1000 meters (about 3281 feet) below the surface of the ocean, where they create habitat for many species of fish. Ocean acidification is expected to take longer to reach the deeper waters, but just as for tropical reefs, over time it could reduce calcification, decreasing the rate of growth of deep-water corals. Furthermore, deep-water species may be less able to tolerate changing conditions than their shallow water counterparts. Many deep-dwelling organisms are adapted to the unvarying conditions that characterize the deep sea and may be less able to cope with change, such as increasing ocean acidity.
As the ocean’s ecosystems change, so too will the services they provide to society. For example, every year, millions of scuba divers and snorkelers visit coral reefs to enjoy their beauty and abundant sea life. Local businesses generate income by offering diving tours and recreational fishing trips, and hotels, restaurants, and other businesses based near the reef ecosystems also benefit from the influx of visitors. One estimate places the total global value of coral-reef based recreation and tourism at $9.6 billion. Ocean acidification threatens the survival of these beautiful and valuable ecosystems.
In 2007, the wild fish and shellfish harvested by the U.S. fishing industry were valued at $3.7 billion. Ocean acidification could jeopardize this industry by altering the growth and development of economically important species of fish, either directly or through effects on the ecosystems of which these species are a part. The bottom line could be a reduction in the yield of commercial fisheries, affecting livelihoods of fishermen and the availability of seafood in markets and restaurants.
The Pacific Northwest is home to a $111 million shellfish industry, but in recent years, several of the region’s oyster hatcheries have reported that oyster larvae are dying. In recent years some oyster hatcheries have experienced 70 to 80 percent decreases in production due to massive losses of oyster larvae, and wild oysters in some regions have not reproduced since 2005. Now, some researchers and oyster farmers are attributing this loss to ocean acidification.
In 2008, researchers noticed that die-offs on the outer coast tended to happen after coastal upwelling events. Upwelling refers to the upsurge of deep water, which is colder and more acidic, that occurs when the winds push coastal surface waters offshore. Another link between the oyster larvae deaths and ocean acidification was identified when a group of researchers found that Puget Sound, where many of the region’s oyster farms are located, was becoming acidic more quickly than the surrounding waters. However, it would be premature to conclude that ocean acidification is the cause of the oyster hatchery failures. Other factors, such as nutrient pollution from runoff, or bacterial and viral infections, could also play a role.
Some shellfish farms have already taken steps to protect oyster larvae from more acidic water, for example by installing monitoring systems that allow frequent sampling of water quality parameters, including pH and carbon dioxide. Determining the exact cause, or causes, of the oyster larvae deaths will require more research—and until then, the Northwest’s shellfish farmers will continue to struggle to find a way to keep their oysters, and hence their livelihoods, healthy and productive.
The Pacific Northwest is not the only area that is concerned about the effects of ocean acidification on their shellfish industry. In February 2015 an article Louisiana oysters are highly vulnerable to ocean acidification, new study says was published at nola.com. The article cited a study published in Nature that identified the Louisiana oyster fisheries as being highly vulnerable to ocean acidification. Analysis of ocean acidification data and trends by NRDC has also identified ocean acidification hot spots in the Gulf of Maine and in several eastern estuaries where the shellfish industry may be threatened in the future.
Mounting evidence suggests that ocean acidification has the potential to alter ecosystems, the health of coral reefs, shellfish, and fisheries; and affect society and the economy on a global scale. Even if carbon dioxide emissions were curtailed immediately, the ocean would still become more acidic, as it continues to absorb the recently increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere for many years to come. So what can we do?
A better understanding of the potential effects of ocean acidification, as well as the ability to anticipate these changes, will be needed for fishery managers, industries, and communities to plan and adapt. Ocean acidification research is still in its infancy, but the United States government has taken steps to establish a national ocean acidification research program to support this emerging field.
To more fully understand and address the threat that ocean acidification poses, a recent report from the National Research Council recommends developing a coordinated, cooperative system for collecting and analyzing ocean data. Documenting changes over time—akin to the Keeling Curve—is particularly important. Establishment of a global effort to regularly sample ocean chemistry and collect biological data such as the rate of coral growth or the abundance of various types of plankton at sites throughout the ocean would form the core of an ocean acidification research program.
Like climate change, ocean acidification is a global phenomenon with global consequences. As further ocean acidification seems inevitable, adaptation to such change will be necessary. Work to investigate this problem and to develop ways to adapt will require cooperation and coordination at the international, national, regional, state, and local levels, as well as collaboration among scientists and researchers in a wide range of disciplines.
Despite acidification being a global problem, there are localized effects and local actions that can be taken to begin to address the problem. One area of the country where this is occurring is the Pacific Northwest. Read this blog post to see what is being done in Oregon and Washington to combat ocean acidification and what actions you can take. Also see this Scientific American article Acid Oceans Can Be Fought at Home.
Similarly, New England states are also beginning to band together to address OA by promoting local research to determine the impact that local factors such as nutrient loading and fertilizer runoff have on ocean acidification.
A good summary of the issues presented above is contained in the article Sea Change - The Pacific's Perilous Turn that appeared in the Seattle Times in September 2013. The article has several embedded videos, as well as great photos and graphics.
Also see the movie A Sea Change, recipient of the NOAA 2010 Environmental Hero Award.
NOAA, Washington Sea Grant, University of Washington, the West Coast Acidification and Hypoxia Science Panel and other organizations collaborated on a very informative 2-page fact sheet Ocean Acidification in the Pacific Northwest.
The Southern California Coastal Ocean Observing System (SCCOOS) is conducting OA research and has a webpage for their 2012 Ocean Acidification Project which contains general information about OA, a discussion of research being conducted by SCCOOS and partner organizations, and links to various research programs and data sources.
This Ocean Acidification website from the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) is a great compendium of OA news and science.